CYCLE: Reasons and Passions. From classical Greece to neuroscience
SPEAKER: Mario De Caro
DATE: Thursday 9 October, 6 pm
According to a millennia-old philosophical tradition, human reason would know how it would be right to behave; unfortunately, however, emotions and passions continually interfere, and often lead us to act in morally inappropriate ways. This is the Plato-Kant line. According to another tradition, the primacy of reason, on the other hand, is a myth to be debunked because morality rather descends from passions and emotions and reason is little more than a frill. This is the Hume-Nietzsche line. The contrast between these two classical traditions continues to this day. However, there is also an alternative tradition, long a minority, which in recent years has been strongly revived at the border between philosophy and psychology. According to this tradition, the solution lies in the middle: a proper integration of rational and emotional factors is indispensable to produce harmonious morality. This is the Aristotle-Dewey line. Who is right?